You saw it break. The next reader sees it work. Find the missing context, then write a report they can replay.
Go to page 2→Filter the gallery→0 results. Why?
Three fictional mini-apps. Real practice for better ArtiGram feedback.
01 / Remove a step. Change the evidence.
Make the failure travel.
Interactive rehearsal / no real defects alleged
The first replay fails. Uncheck Go to page 2 and watch the bug disappear. Then cut unnecessary actions or change their order. Each replay starts clean.
SIMULATION
What this mini-app shows
What the same inputs call for
Inspect every state transition
Selected action, in order
App state after action
Expected state
Include the starting state.
“The filter is broken” leaves out where you began. A page number, saved value or selected mode can be the trigger.
Keep the order and exact input.
Changing a price before a discount is not the same as changing it afterward. “1,5” is not “1.5”.
Separate seeing from explaining.
Report the result you observed and the one you expected. A theory about the cause belongs in a separate note.
02 / Put your own finding into words.
A handoff the creator can use.
Use an ArtiGram post link and your actual observations. The prompts check for missing information only. They cannot establish whether a real bug exists.